Last Updated on April 26, 2025 by Rakshitha

Merger and acquisition in the Indian banking system

Merger and acquisition in the Indian banking system has created bigger, more robust institutions that can resist economic stresses and meet the rising requirements of the Indian economy and effect of mergers and acquisitions in the Indian banking sector. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the government have promoted mergers and acquisitions in Indian banks after liberalization to improve capital adequacy, consumer reach, and financial stability. Study of post-merger effect on performance of banks in India especially among public sector banks, have improved operational efficiency and reduced the number of fragmented institutions, which hampered regulatory monitoring and financial stability.

The Indian government united 10 public sector banks into four very large ones in 2019. By merging, banks try to make “anchor banks” that can compete with global rivals, cut down on operating waste, and offer more financial services. If Indian banks merge, their customers may be spread out over a wider area, which would help with problems of regional concentration. Even though it’s hard to deal with company culture and connect technology systems, size and operating unity have made it easier to give money and run the business.

Indian banks are more robust due to M&A-improved balance sheets, capital buffers, and risk management. These mergers help banks achieve economies of scale, decreasing costs and expanding market reach, enhancing long-term profitability. Consolidation streamlines RBI policy implementation and regulatory monitoring. M&A would likely strengthen and boost competition in Indian banks, enabling them weather global market volatility and maintain economic growth.

Effect of mergers and acquisitions in the Indian banking sector

Indian banking industry mergers and acquisitions (M&A) have transformed financial services, changing competitive dynamics and operational efficiency. These consolidations have typically aimed to build bigger, more robust banks that can withstand economic shocks and service the various requirements of a rising economy. Banks may increase profitability by combining to generate economies of scale, simplify operations, and save expenses. The merger of public sector banks has reduced overlapping branches and resources, enabling merging firms to concentrate on core capabilities and enhance customer service.

The amalgamated firms’ capital bases and risk management have improved due to M&A activity. Larger M&A-formed banks have higher capital adequacy ratios and may lend more and diversify. A strong banking sector is essential for infrastructure development and SMEs in emerging economies like India. Consolidating weaker banks into stronger ones reduces systemic financial risks, boosting investor and depositor trust.

M&A in Indian banking has had hurdles. Integration of multiple corporate cultures, systems, and procedures may cause operational challenges. Employees and stakeholders typically fight mergers, which may slow them down. Excessive consolidation may restrict competition, raising consumer prices and lowering service quality. Indian banks must balance consolidation advantages with the requirement to maintain a competitive banking environment for long-term viability. Thus, although M&As provide development and stability, they need careful strategy and execution to achieve their goals.

Mergers and acquisitions in Indian banks after liberalization

The banking industry underwent a major transformation in the early 1990s with the liberalization of the Indian economy, which spurred M&A to improve competitiveness and efficiency. Before liberalization, the Indian banking sector was highly regulated, resulting in many tiny banks. Government economic changes supported bank consolidation, which helped them attain economies of scale, capital adequacy, and service improvements. Many banks explored strategic alliances and acquisitions to increase their market presence and improve operational efficiency.

Private sector banks became prominent actors in Indian banking in the late 1990s and early 2000s, causing significant M&A activity. The 2000 purchase of Bank of Madura by ICICI Bank and the merging of HDFC Bank with Times Bank showed the sector’s consolidation tendency. These acquisitions helped acquiring banks utilize client bases, strengthen branch networks, and increase product ranges. Foreign banks’ entrance also spurred local banks to explore M&A to stay competitive in a liberalized market.

In the 2010s, M&A in the Indian banking industry, notably among public sector banks, increased as the government moved to address mounting NPAs and the need for capital. The 2017 merger of five affiliate banks with State Bank of India was a major step to strengthen the bank and improve financial stability. Consolidating weak banks into stronger ones reduced financial systemic risks. M&A transactions post-liberalization have transformed India’s banking sector, improving resilience and efficiency and helping banks meet the economy’s changing demands.

Study of post-merger effect on performance of banks in India

Since mergers are generally done to improve efficiency, financial health, and market share, academics and industry experts have focused on the post-merger impact on Indian banks. Banks seek synergies, decrease operational redundancies, and improve consumer offers after a merger. Studies show that merging systems, cultures, and processes causes short-term disruptions in many Indian banks after a merger. Cost efficiency and a larger client base help these banks enhance financial performance measures like ROA and ROE over time.

The 2017 merger of State Bank of India (SBI) and its member banks created a bigger organization with greater lending capacity and operational efficiency. Post-merger assessments showed that resource allocation and economies of scale increased SBI’s market share and profitability. The amalgamated business also offered additional financial products, improving client happiness and retention. This instance shows how good integration techniques may boost post-merger performance, confirming the advantages of banking consolidation.

The examination of post-merger performance shows that not all mergers succeed. Cultural conflicts, poor integration, and operational harmonization may cause underperformance. Because of bureaucratic inefficiencies and staff reluctance to change, numerous public sector bank mergers have failed to provide projected gains. Banks need strategic integration planning, clear communication, and cultural alignment to succeed post-merger. Banks may improve their merger management and long-term profitability by proactively addressing these issues.

Topics Covered:

Pay and Download Report Now

Please use the link below for international payments.

Pay and Download Report Now

Checkout our full MBA project Report topics in Marketing

Our Other Available MBA Projects Report Categories are:

MBA Project in HR, Operations, Finance, Hospitality/Healthcare, Tours and Travels, CRM, E Business, General Management, Information System, International Business Management, Project Management, Retail Operation Management etc.

To Download sample Project Report, Proposal, PPT, Synopsis for free Reach us on WhatsApp: +91 9481545735